Hey everybody, I'm headed off to the mountain tomorrow (eegads!!) but wanted to put up a quick post before my departure. This opinion piece from the New York Times caught my eye and I thought I would share....
I'm not entirely sure where I stand in this argument except to say that pretty much every service offered in America has an element of *racism* to it just based on how our country operates on a socio-economic level. That the powers-that-be would then apply a quota in order to level the playing field strikes me as counter-productive.
Really, the last sentence of this piece matters most: We should be trying to
identify children with disabilities and to provide them with an
education adapted to their individual academic, physical, or behavioral
needs.
What do YOU think??
####
More than 6 million children in the United States receive
special education services for their disabilities. Of those age 6 and
older, nearly 20% are black.
Critics claim that this high number — blacks are 1.4 times more likely
to be placed in special education than other races and ethnicities
combined — shows that black children are put into special education
because schools are racially biased.
But our new research suggests just the opposite. The real problem is
that black children are under-represented in special education classes
when compared with white children with similar levels of academic
achievement, behavior, and family economic resources.
The belief that black children are over-represented in special education
is driving some misguided attempts at policy changes. To flag supposed
racial bias in special education placement, the United States Department of Education is thinking of adopting a single standard for all states of what is an
allowable amount of over-representation of minority children.
If well-intentioned but misguided advocates succeed in arbitrarily
limiting placement in special education based on racial demographics,
even more black children with disabilities will miss out on beneficial
services.
Black children face double jeopardy when it comes to succeeding in
school. They are far more likely to be exposed to the gestational,
environmental, and economic risk factors that often result in
disabilities. Yet black children are less likely to be told they have
disabilities, and to be treated for them, than otherwise similar white
children.
About 65% of black children, compared with about 30% of
white children, live in families with incomes below 200% of the
poverty line. From 1985 to 2000, about 80% of black children grew
up in highly disadvantaged neighborhoods characterized by widespread
unemployment, racial segregation, poverty, single-parent households, and
welfare.
36% of inner-city black children have elevated levels of
lead in their blood. The figure for suburban white children is only 4%. Black children are about twice as likely to be born prematurely
and three times more likely to suffer from fetal alcohol syndrome.
In a study published today, we report that the under-diagnosis of black children occurs across five
disability conditions for which special services are commonly provided —
learning disabilities, speech or language impairments, intellectual
disabilities, health impairments, and emotional disturbances. From the
beginning of kindergarten to the end of eighth grade, black children are
less, not more, likely than white children with similar levels of
academic performance and behaviors to be identified as having each of
these disabilities.
In fact, our study statistically controlled for many possible factors
that might explain these disparities. Examples included differences in
children's academic achievement, behavior, gender and age, birth weight,
the mother's marital status, and the family's income and education
levels. In contrast, many previous studies reporting over-representation
have not adjusted for these factors. Instead, these prior studies have
relied on school- or district-level data that did not adequately control
for differences in risk factor exposure between black and white
children.
It may be that black children are less likely to be identified and
treated for disabilities because of a greater responsiveness by
education professionals to white parents. Low expectations regarding
black children's abilities may also lead some professionals to ignore
the neurological basis of low academic achievement and "problem"
behavior. Even those black children who do receive a diagnosis are less
likely to receive help. For example, despite being more likely to
experience symptoms of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, black
children are less likely than white children to be given a diagnosis of
A.D.H.D. And even among those who are given an A.D.H.D. diagnosis, black
children are less likely than white children to receive medication to
treat the condition.
The last thing we need is to compound these widespread disparities in
disability diagnosis and treatment by making school officials reluctant
to refer black children for special education eligibility evaluations
out of fear of being labeled racially biased.
Pamphlets describing a school district's disability eligibility
procedures are often written in dense legalese that may be hard for many
parents to understand. Revising them might make it easier for parents
to advocate for their children during the eligibility evaluation
process. Community outreach programs can also help overcome cultural
barriers to identifying children with disabilities.
Such programs have already been shown to reduce racial disparities in
children's health and health care access. We should be trying to
identify children with disabilities and to provide them with an
education adapted to their individual academic, physical, or behavioral
needs.
No comments:
Post a Comment